The Real Buddha

Modern Buddha and Vishnu Avatar Buddha are Different

by Srila Bhakti Vallabh Tirtha Maharaja

The Vedas encode instructions according to the eligibility or qualification of various living beings, especially human beings. But in the course of time, ignorant men took the tamasika[1] orders to be the only instruction of the Vedas[2] and engaged in the extensive killing of animals, sometimes even sacrificing human beings during worship of the demigods. At that time, the Supreme Lord descended in the form of Buddha and outwardly rejected the teachings of the Vedas for the welfare of human beings incapable of comprehending the true teachings of the Vedas. This implies that He disputed and cancelled His own prior teachings, propounded the futility of belief in God and preached to human beings four noble truths, to free them from their violent practices. This act of Buddha provided instantaneous benediction to mankind of that period. Further reading on this link: http://vedabase.net/sb/1/3/24/en

As Lord Buddha was the Supreme Lord Himself, many people resolved to follow ahimsa-dharma-the path of non-violence, due to His influence. As a result of non-violence, the hearts of human beings became pious and their qualifications gradually increased, so Lord Siva appeared as Sankaracarya. He re-established the supreme authenticity and decorum of the Vedas, and founded the philosophy of ‘brahmakarana-vada’ (Brahman as ultimate cause). In later ages, the Vaishnava stalwarts built the philosophy of bhakti upon this same foundation stone. From the personal and aggregate point of view, these are the steps of progress.

Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, who is the Lord Himself, removed the incompleteness of the previously propagated philosophies through His ‘acintya-bhedabheda-tattva’ philosophy (the principle of inconceivable simultaneous distinction and non-distinction).

It is said that Sakyasimha Buddha, the son of Suddhodana and Maya, and Buddha-avatara, the Vaishnavas’ object of adoration, are not one and the same person. Our Most Revered Nitya lila pravishta Om Vishnupada 108 Sri Srimad Bhakti Siddhanta Sarasvati Gosvami Prabhupada has clearly said, “Sakyasimha Buddha was merely a vastly learned person, so we cannot call him the original Buddha or Lord Buddha.”

Acarya Sri Sankara has by mistake referred to Maya’s son, Buddha, as ‘Sugata Buddha’ in the following commentary:

sarvatha api anadaraniya ayam sugata-samayah sreyaskamaih iti abhiprayah Amarakosha-grantha (Sanskrit dictionary) states:

sarvajnah sugato buddho dharmarajastathagatah
samastabhadro bhagavan marajillokajijjinah
shadabhijno dasabalo ’dvayavadi vinayakah
munindrah srighanah sasta munih sakyamunistu yah

“All-knowing, transcendental, buddha, king of righteousness, he who has come, beneficent, all-encompassing, lord, conqueror of the god of love-mara, victorious of three worlds, he who controls his senses, protector from the six enemies, possessor of the ten powers, speaker of monism (one absolute), teacher, lord of the sages, embodiment of splendor and eminent saint.” In his commentary on the above verse, Srila Ragunatha Cakravarti has written:

“All eighteen names of Buddha from ‘sarvajna’ (omniscient) to ‘sakyamuni’, refer to Vishnu-avatara Buddha. Therefore, ‘Sugata’ clearly refers only to Vishnu-avatara Buddha.

sa sakyasimhah sarvarthasiddhah sauddhodanisca sah
gautamascarkabandhusca mayadevisutasca sah

“teacher of the sakyas, lion of the sakyas, accomplisher of all goals, son of suddhodana, of gautama’s line, friend of scholars, son of mayadevi.”

Here, Srila Ragunatha Cakravarti has written:

ete sapta shakyabangshabatirneh buddhamuni bisheshe

“The seven aliases from ‘sakyasimha buddha’ down to ‘mayadevisuta’ (the son of mayadevi) refer to monks belonging to the sakya dynasty.”

Thus, Sugata Buddha and Sunyavadi (Sakyasimha) Buddha are not the same person. Further evidence is found in Mr. H.T.Colebrooke’s Amarakosha, published at Ramapura in 1807. It is written in Chapter 21, Page 178 of Lalitavistara-grantha that Gautama Buddha performed penances at the same place as the previous Buddha (Vishnu-avatara Buddha). Maybe it is for this reason that in later ages he and Lord Buddha are considered as being one:

esha dharanimunde purvabuddhasanasthah
samartha dhanurgrihitva sunya nairatmavanaih
klesaripum nihatva drishtijalanca bhitva-siva
virajamsokam prapsyate bodhimagryam

Currently this place is known as Buddha Gaya but Srimad-Bhagavatam refers to it as Kikata Pradesa:

tatah kalau sampravritte sammohaya sura-dvisham
buddho namnanjana-sutah kikateshu bhavishyati

(srimad-bhagavatam 1.3.24)

“Thereafter, in the twenty-first manvantara at the beginning of Kali-yuga, the Lord will appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Anjana, in Kikata Pradesa (the province of Gaya-Bihar), just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful demigods.”

According to Sri Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura’s commentary:

anjana suto ’jina sutasceti pathadvayam
kikateshu madhye gayapradese

“The names anjanasuta[3] and ajinasuta can both be found in the above verse. the province of Gaya has been called Kikateshu.”

Srila Sridhara Svamipada has written in his commentary:

buddhavataramaha tata iti
anjanasya sutah
ajinasuta iti pathe ajino ’pi sa eva
kikateshu madhye gayapradese

“Buddha-avatara refers to buddha who is the son of Anjana, and also in another reading, the son of Ajina. in the above verse, the name is written as Ajina or Anjana, and Kikata refers to Gaya Pradesa.”

It is written in the 29th Verse, 36th Chapter of Sri Nrisimha Purana:

kalau prapte yatha buddho bhavennarayana prabhuh

“Lord Narayana appeared as Buddha when the age of Kali started.”

This clearly implies that Lord Buddha appeared five thousand years ago. The following verse can be found in the second paragraph of Nirnaya-sindhu:

jyaishtha sukladitiyayam buddhajanma bhavishyati “Buddha will take birth on the 2nd day of the sukla-paksha[4] of the month of Jyaishtha[5] .”

Another part of this book describes the mode of worshipping Buddha:

pausha suklasya saptamyam kuryyat bhuddhasya pujanam

“Worship Lord Buddha on the 7th day of the sukla-paksha of the month of Pausha[6].”

This is the prescription for the worship of Buddha, the avatara of the Supreme Lord. The full moon day of the month of Vaisakha[7], known as ‘Buddha-purnima’, is to be celebrated for both Buddhas, subject to consideration of both Buddhas together.

In Sri Madhvacarya’s commentary on Verse 1.3.24 of Srimad-Bhagavatam, from his book Bhagavata-tatparya, the following quotation from Brahmanda Purana has been referred to:

mohanartham danavanam balarupi pathisthitah
putram tam kalpayamasa mudhabudhirjinah svayam
tatah sammohayamasa jinadyana suramsakan
bhagavan vagbhirugrabhirahimsa vacibhirharih

(Brahmanda Purana)

“In order to delude the demons, he (Lord Buddha) was present in the form of a child on the way while the fool, jina (a demon), imagined him to be his son. later on, Lord Sri Hari (as avatara-buddha) expertly deluded jina and other demons by his strong words of non-violence.”

There is an authentic Buddhist book, Lankavatara-sutra[8], in which Ravana, the king of Lanka, prays to Jina’s son, the ancient Lord Buddha, and to all the Buddhas and Buddhas’ sons who would appear in the future, via this eulogy (stava):

atha ravano lankadhipatih gathagiten anugayati sma
lankavatarasutram vaih purvabuddhanuvarnitam
smarami purvakaih buddhairjinaputra-puraskritaih
putrametannigadyate bhagavanapi bhashatam
bhavishyantyanapate kale buddha buddhasutasca ye

Therefore, this source leaves no doubt that the ancient avatara-Buddha and the modern Gautama Buddha are not the same person.

This book here below from page 41 gives more insights on who is the real Buddha  beyond_nirvana_1st_ed_2003

FOOTNOTES:

[1] The mode of ignorance.
[2] In the scriptures animal sacrifice is specified to enable society to gradually rise above violent tendencies.
[3] Suta means “son.”
[4] Sukla-paksha: The moonlit half of a lunar month-the bright fortnight.
[5] Jyaishtha: The 2nd month of the Hindu (Lunar) calendar (Summer).
[6] Pausha: the 9th month of the Hindu (Lunar) Calendar (Winter).
[7] Vaishakha month: the 1st month of the Hindu (Lunar) Calendar.
[8] Lankavatara-sutra was published with the help of the Indian Buddhist Text Society and Bengal Government in January 1900 A.D.

—From the book “Dasavatara-The Ten Manifestations of God”

Advertisements
4 Comments

4 thoughts on “The Real Buddha

  1. This is very interesting. I had not learned of this previously, as my exposure to HInduism was limited during my graduate studies (I have an MA in Indo-Tibetan Buddhism from Naropa University). But I am particularly amused by the fact that Buddha (here) is depicted as a “fallen” Hindu… Having converted to Buddhism five years ago from Catholicism (wherein we worshiped a “fallen” Jew) it seems that my Karma is such that I align myself with those (men) who become outcast from their given culture.

    Thanks for the book recommendation. I will try to get a copy to learn more! 🌱

    Like

    • Sorry to hear that. Sometimes we have to plough through the misgivings until we get the real juice.Many Buddhists don’t know there are two Buddhas. There is also no such word anywhere in Sanskrit of the Vedas called Hindu or Hinduism. It was a term coined in relatively recent times by India’s Conquerors, but that’s another story 🙂 Here on this link, you can get the book:http://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Nirvana-Philosophy-Mayavadism-History/dp/8186737812
      You can download it for free on some links, but unless you have Sanskrit diacritics on your computer, it will come out funny and distorted. Feel welcome to ask any question which may spring to mind. I will be pleased to help. 🙂 Wishing you well.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Amazing. To me, there exists a peace in void. I enjoyed reading “The Monkey”. It included a protagonist that endured becoming a bodhidsatva. The book is not too long, easy to read, and available on amazon.com. I cannot wait to see this blog again. 🙂

    Like

    • I, like you, am an ardent student of knowledge. I think the latin term ‘ipsae pro se loqui’ is appropriate in this context. 🙂

      There is indeed, a temporary peace in the void or what we refer to as Brahman (impersonal aspect), the first stage on the path to knowing the Absolute Truth. The next stage is called Paramatma or the localised Deity/guru, in the heart. Finally, it culminates in milan (meeting/actual realisation) of the initial two, assuming form, known as Bhagavan, the Supreme Truth in all His opulent absoluteness.

      Many thanks for visiting. 🙂

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s